Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is way newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos, a much better video quality and a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.