Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having an 87 score against 71.8. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's a little thinner and noticeably newer.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a camera with much more megapixels. The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.