Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy F41's body is way newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a larger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy F41 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy F41 also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy F41 has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy F41 has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 46 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.