Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a global score of 98 against 71.8. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is incredibly newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it is much heavier and a little thicker.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a way better video definition, a much higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.