Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's 75.8 general score. Apple iPhone X's design is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, even though both were released only a few months apart. IPhone X counts with a faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has less RAM and less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. The iPhone X features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
IPhone X captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone X also has a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.