Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, getting a 90.8 score against 74.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is notably newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better pixel amount per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger aperture. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.