Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-01-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, getting a general score of 81.6 against 80.3. Google Pixel 2 is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but it is much lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has higher video frame rates, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.