Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-01-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's overall score of 80.3. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but LG managed to build it just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 takes much better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rate and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.