Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 80.3 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released around 9 months before. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a screen that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's display, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same sensor size and a same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way higher video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.