Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a 95.4 score against 80.3. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.