Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-01-15 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a 90.7 score against 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a quite higher pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a lot higher video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture, a way higher 200 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality. Galaxy S25 Ultra features better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.