Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 227.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's 74.6 general score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and notably thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, although it's also somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a larger screen, a bit higher pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low light environments, a much higher video resolution, a camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.