Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40, we must highlight that it's also a older, way heavier and thicker cellphone. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and videos and a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.