Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 79.9. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per screen inch.
Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Galaxy A25 5G has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.