Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a incredibly newer cellphone than Galaxy A5 (2017), although it's incredibly heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.