Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A6, having a general score of 81.1 against 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than Galaxy A6, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each display inch, a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better (4K) video quality.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.