Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, having a general score of 81.1 against 77.8. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a extremely heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but both of them are equally thin.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a processor that is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's processing unit, because although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater pixels number per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.