Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it thinner and lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a bit larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much greater processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.