Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than vivo X70 Pro, we must note that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and heavier phone.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the vivo X70 Pro have similar cameras, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a camera in the back with a lot lower 50 mega-pixels resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a larger sensor.
The vivo X70 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.