Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's overall score of 81.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is newer and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's, but it's also heavier. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, providing some extra features.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a bit larger screen and more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a lot lower 50 MP resolution, and they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a 0 percent lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.