Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's score of 76.6. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body has the same weight than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it's just a little thinner.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a more mega pixels camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.