Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a general score of 78.3 against 76.6. Vivo X70 Pro's body is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X70 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a more mega-pixels back camera, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.