Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is older, thicker and heavier than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. The vivo X70 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per screen inch.
Vivo X70 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger camera sensor.
Vivo X70 Pro has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit longer battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.