Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Yezz | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.42 x 3.27 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is way better than the Yezz ANDY A6Q's global score of 49.9. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Yezz ANDY A6Q has Android 4.2. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is heavier but a bit thinner than Yezz ANDY A6Q.
LG V50 ThinQ features a better display than Yezz ANDY A6Q, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a quite bigger screen and a way better pixel count per display inch. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Yezz ANDY A6Q, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a greater performance than Yezz ANDY A6Q, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features greater battery performance than Yezz ANDY A6Q, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better pictures and videos than Yezz ANDY A6Q, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.