Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a score of 87.5 against 80.2. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy A71 body is a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and they were only released 9 months apart.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A71, because it has 128 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 takes slightly better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 has a bit better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A71 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.