Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 76.6. IPhone 8 Plus is a notably older and heavier cellphone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but Apple was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone 8 Plus has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The iPhone 8 Plus features a bit faster CPU than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone 8 Plus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos, a lot tinier camera sensor which provides a lot lower photo and video quality and a much lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a very superior battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.