Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 global score. Although the Apple iPhone XS is older and a bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is still a little bit thinner. IPhone XS features just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS counts with a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Apple iPhone XS features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor which gives a much worse image and video quality, a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in low-light situations and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.