Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a general score of 77.7 against 76.6. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Although HTC One M9 is noticeably older and somewhat thicker than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 features just a little better performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.