Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's overall score of 76.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has superior battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 26 percent greater battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same sensor size and a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.