Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is way better than the ZTE Axon 20's general score of 77.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than ZTE Axon 20, it is thicker and heavier. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. ZTE Axon 20 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a lot better video resolution, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light photos.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much memory capacity for applications and games as the ZTE Axon 20, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than ZTE Axon 20, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.