Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-06-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's global score of 78.1. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra works with Android 11 OS. IPhone 13 Pro Max's construction is a little bit thinner but way heavier than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a greater processing power than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution.
IPhone 13 Pro Max's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra one, they have the same internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4352mAh.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.