Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 overall score. IPhone XS's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The iPhone XS counts with a bit faster processor than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XS features a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a quite greater count of pixels per display inch. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 73% more battery capacity.
Apple iPhone XS costs more than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.