Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has an overall score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a much newer and somewhat thinner phone than the HTC One M9, although it's heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 has a little faster processor than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit CPU. The HTC One M9 features a brighter display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixel density.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera, a way higher video definition and a way bigger camera aperture for better low-light images. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 62% more battery size.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC One M9, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.