Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a general score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra design is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 3S both count with incredibly similar displays, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little worse display density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot more MP back-facing camera. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better battery duration than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it is more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.