Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a general score of 97.6 against 78.1. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and notably heavier than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's construction is still thinner.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The Galaxy Fold features a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.