Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a 98 score against 78.1. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better phone than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, we must note that it's also older, thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a better screen pixels density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.