Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with a general score of 81 against 78.1. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you the same OS features. Despite being the best device in this review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier device than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and the Galaxy XCover Pro feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.