Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with a score of 94.6 against 78.1. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely heavier but thinner than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and they were released only 9 months apart. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processing unit than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger camera aperture.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.