Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-07-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.90 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum; plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Single-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is much better than the ZTE Axon's 63.1 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has the older 4.4.4 version and ZTE Axon has Android 5.1. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Motorola DROID Turbo is an a bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the ZTE Axon.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better screen than ZTE Axon, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display density. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon, because it has more internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior processor than ZTE Axon, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory, a higher number of faster cores and a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery performance than ZTE Axon, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs exactly the same than ZTE Axon, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.