Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 52 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Kyocera |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2020-04-23 |
| 4.74 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 4.36 x 2.22 x 1.07 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.80 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 489.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 2.6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 233 pixels per inch | 154 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm 215 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.44 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | -- |
| 4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Battery | 1770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Kyocera DuraXV Extreme is a bit better than the ZTE Blade III, having a 52 score against 47.2. Kyocera DuraXV Extreme's body is thicker and extremely heavier than the ZTE Blade III. Kyocera DuraXV Extreme has a bit faster CPU than ZTE Blade III, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The ZTE Blade III has a much more vibrant screen than Kyocera DuraXV Extreme, because it has a lot higher resolution of 800 x 480 pixels, a way larger display and a lot greater pixel number per inch in the screen. The Kyocera DuraXV Extreme's camera is very similar to the ZTE Blade III one, and although the Kyocera DuraXV Extreme has a way better (HD) video quality, they both have a 5 megapixels resolution camera.
Kyocera DuraXV Extreme counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than ZTE Blade III, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 12 GB more internal memory. The Kyocera DuraXV Extreme features just a little better battery lifetime than ZTE Blade III, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Kyocera DuraXV Extreme is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.