Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.48 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, getting a global score of 83.7 against 54.2. These devices include Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while ZTE Blade Vec 3G has Android 4.4. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a larger screen and way more pixels per inch of display.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a more powerful CPU than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery lifetime than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better videos and photos than ZTE Blade Vec 3G, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 12 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the ZTE Blade Vec 3G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.