Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace
GT-S5830, GT-S5830I| Global Score | |
| 45 | 48.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 2.3, 2.2 |
| -- | 2011-01-26 |
| 4.10 x 2.20 x 0.70 inches | 4.43 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 3.99 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 3.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 480 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 7.11 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 161,79 MB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 2.02 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (20 fps) (HD) video resolution | 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 5.83 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 3 | 3.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 640 hours standby time 11 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Ace is a little bit better than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, having a 48.3 score against 45. Galaxy Ace's body is a bit heavier but incredibly thinner than the ZTE Cymbal Z-320. ZTE Cymbal Z-320 counts with a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Ace, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy Ace has a more vivid screen than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has a bigger screen, a quite greater pixels density and a lot better 480 x 320 resolution. The Galaxy Ace takes clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 20 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy Ace also has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Cymbal Z-320 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Ace, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Cymbal Z-320 also has 4 GB internal storage. ZTE Cymbal Z-320 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Ace is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.