Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45 | 47.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 2.3.6 |
| -- | 2012-03-06 |
| 4.10 x 2.20 x 0.70 inches | 4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 3.42 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Single-Core 832 MHz processor |
| 512 MB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 304 GPU | GPU |
| 7.92 | 7.02 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 3 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 3.52 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (20 fps) (HD) video resolution | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 3 | 3.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 15.8 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer and Compass |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Pocket has a general score of 47.8, which is a bit better than ZTE Cymbal Z-320's overall score of 45. The Galaxy Pocket construction is lighter and incredibly thinner than the ZTE Cymbal Z-320. ZTE Cymbal Z-320 has a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Pocket, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy Pocket has a bit sharper display than ZTE Cymbal Z-320. Both have a display with the same size, an equal 320 x 240 resolution and the same pixels density. The ZTE Cymbal Z-320 features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Pocket, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 32 GB, the ZTE Cymbal Z-320 also has more internal storage.
ZTE Cymbal Z-320 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Pocket, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the ZTE Cymbal Z-320 also has a much better (HD) video definition. The ZTE Cymbal Z-320 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Pocket, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Pocket not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.