| Global Score | |
| 55.3 | 60.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 4.4 | Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 |
| -- | 2011-10-31 |
| 5.30 x 2.60 x 0.40 inches | 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2839.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| LCD | S-LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G) and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 5.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 14 hours talk time | 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The HTC Raider 4G has an overall score of 60.8, which is just a bit better than ZTE Speed's score of 55.3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC Raider 4G has 4.0.3 version while ZTE Speed has Android 4.4 version. The HTC Raider 4G construction is extremely heavier and a bit thicker than the ZTE Speed.
ZTE Speed counts with a bit sharper display than HTC Raider 4G. Both of them have the same exact 960 x 540 resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a same size display. HTC Raider 4G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than ZTE Speed, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 32 GB, the HTC Raider 4G also has 8 GB more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Speed features a superior performance than HTC Raider 4G, and although they both have 1 GB of RAM, the ZTE Speed also has 2 more processing cores, a 64-bits processing unit and a faster graphics co-processor. ZTE Speed has improved battery duration than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 23% more battery size.
HTC Raider 4G takes greater photos and videos than ZTE Speed, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, HTC Raider 4G is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.