Compare phones
ZTE Warp Sync
N9515Kyocera Hydro Elite
C6750| Global Score | |
| 54.8 | 59.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Kyocera |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.1 |
| -- | 2013-08-27 |
| 5.60 x 2.90 x 0.40 inches | 4.82 x 2.38 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.51 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 294 pixels per inch | 342 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1,5 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.25 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 12 hours talk time | 236 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Hydro Elite is a bit better than the ZTE Warp Sync, getting a score of 59.6 against 54.8. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Kyocera Hydro Elite has older 4.1 version and ZTE Warp Sync has Android 4.4.2 version. The Kyocera Hydro Elite construction is way lighter but just a little thicker than ZTE Warp Sync.
The Kyocera Hydro Elite's processor is very similar to ZTE Warp Sync's processor, although the Kyocera Hydro Elite has 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), a weaker graphics processor running at 400 megahertz and a smaller amount of RAM memory. ZTE Warp Sync counts with just a bit better looking display than Kyocera Hydro Elite, because although it has a bit worse pixel quantity per screen inch, and they both have the same 1280 x 720 resolution, the ZTE Warp Sync also counts with a bigger display.
Kyocera Hydro Elite features a much better camera than ZTE Warp Sync, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Kyocera Hydro Elite also has a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality. Kyocera Hydro Elite counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than ZTE Warp Sync, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB against 64 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Warp Sync features just a bit better battery performance than Kyocera Hydro Elite, because it has 2300mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Kyocera Hydro Elite and the ZTE Warp Sync cost exactly the same, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.