Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2, having an 84.9 score against 81.6. Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 2, it is a little thicker and much heavier. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a better processor than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 11 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The iPhone 11 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3046mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.