Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a notably heavier phone than Google Pixel 3a, but both are equally thin. Apple iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display, a bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The iPhone 11 Pro and the Google Pixel 3a both count with really similar storage for apps and games, they have the same 64 GB internal storage. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size aperture and a 0.39 inches sensor. IPhone 11 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3046mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.