Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 84.9 score against 78.9. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a XL works with Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is somewhat heavier.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a greater performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
IPhone 11 Pro features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor. The Google Pixel 3a XL's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as iPhone 11 Pro's one, they have equal internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.