Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with a general score of 84.9 against 82.9. The iPhone 11 Pro design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4a, but it's a lot heavier. IPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Google Pixel 4a features a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a better CPU than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Google Pixel 4a has a little better battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.