Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the iPhone 11 Pro, getting a general score of 89 against 84.9. Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and lighter than the iPhone 11 Pro. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little greater screen density. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro and the Google Pixel 5 have quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 5 has a camera in the back with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size back camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 5 has a much greater memory for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 34% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 5 is also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.